Lipshitz v. Lipshitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that expansion by a “first user” will constitute infringement upon a later user of a mark if expansion would result in “likelihood of confusion in derogation of established rights of the intervening user”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).