Lipshay v. Barr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding denial of motion for new trial when verdict included no award for pain and suffering; Supreme Court noted there was evidence from which the jury could infer that the plaintiff's injury was not as serious as she contended and that her prolonged absence from work was unnecessary
• no award for pain and suffering where jury could reasonably infer injury was not as serious as contended and portion of medical expenses and absence from work were unnecessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).