Skip to main content
· 1/26/2009

Lipscomb v. Young

Citations

  • 672 S.E.2d 649
  • 284 Ga. 835
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 267
  • 2009 Ga. LEXIS 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • same holding even though the beneficiary “paid for the will with cash that testator had given her”
  • declarations of a testator are not admissible to prove the actual fact of an improper influence by another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.