Skip to main content
· 9/18/2008

Lipscomb v. Winter

Citations

  • 577 F. Supp. 2d 258
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70364
  • 2008 WL 4266116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that regardless of an employee’s protests, an employer maintains a duty to investigate every claim of sexual harassment
  • explaining that regardless of an employee’s protests, an employer maintains a duty to investigate every claim of sexual harassment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.