· 12/29/1978
Lipscomb v. Krause
Citations
- 87 Cal. App. 3d 970
- 151 Cal. Rptr. 465
- 1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 2249
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirmed trial court’s order granting attorney’s motion for nonsuit when plaintiff failed to present expert testimony
- affirmed trial court's order granting attorney's motion for nonsuit when plaintiff failed to present expert testimony
- in legal malpractice action, proof of relative issues generally required testimony of experts as to standard of care and consequences of breach
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hanson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.