Skip to main content
· 12/29/1978

Lipscomb v. Krause

Citations

  • 87 Cal. App. 3d 970
  • 151 Cal. Rptr. 465
  • 1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 2249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirmed trial court’s order granting attorney’s motion for nonsuit when plaintiff failed to present expert testimony
  • affirmed trial court's order granting attorney's motion for nonsuit when plaintiff failed to present expert testimony
  • in legal malpractice action, proof of relative issues generally required testimony of experts as to standard of care and consequences of breach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.