· 11/23/1964
Lipscomb v. Johnson
Citations
- 379 U.S. 923
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that aiding and abetting requires the “specific intent that [the defendant’s] act or omission bring about the underlying crime”
- reversing conviction of defendant on aiding and abetting theory because there was insufficient evidence to show that he aided and abetted a large wire fraud scheme
- “[a] presumption of prejudice arises when a juror is exposed to extra-record evidence and the government is required to rebut that presumption”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.