Skip to main content
· 11/23/1964

Lipscomb v. Johnson

Citations

  • 379 U.S. 923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that aiding and abetting requires the “specific intent that [the defendant’s] act or omission bring about the underlying crime”
  • reversing conviction of defendant on aiding and abetting theory because there was insufficient evidence to show that he aided and abetted a large wire fraud scheme
  • “[a] presumption of prejudice arises when a juror is exposed to extra-record evidence and the government is required to rebut that presumption”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.