Lippus v. Dahlgren Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where plaintiff used summons addressed to one defendant to serve another, motion to dismiss for insufficient process under Rule 12(b)(4) may also be construed as a motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process under Rule 12(b)(5)
• classifying a Rule 12(b)(2) motion for lack of personal jurisdiction under the FSIA as a Rule 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss for insufficient service
• granting plaintiffs 30 days to cure defects in service of process under the FSIA where the defects appeared readily curable, there was little tangible prejudice to the defendant, and the matter was already set to go to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).