Lippoldt v. Hartford Chemical Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the trial court’s finding that the part performance was “reasonably and naturally accounted for by the existence of an oral agreement” was not a finding of fact binding on the reviewing court
• stating that the trial court's finding that the part performance was \reasonably and naturally accounted for by the existence of an oral agreement\ was not a finding of fact binding on the reviewing court
• \[The plaintiff] must first prove acts [of part performance] done by [the plaintiff]. . . .\
• “[The plaintiff] must first prove acts [of part performance] done by [the plaintiff]____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).