Lionel Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff's renewal as principal afteremployer's stigmatizing conduct meant he could not show that it was \virtually impossible\ for him to find employment in chosen field
• concluding that a trial court is not required to “wade through improper denials and legal argument in search of a genuinely disputed fact”
• concluding that a trial court is not required to “wade through improper denials and legal argument in search of a genuinely disputed fact”
• ruling that the burden of opposing summary judgment is “not satisfied by citations to the record that support legal argument rather than controvert material facts”
• ruling that “a disputed issue of fact is “not satisfied by citations to the record that support legal argument rather than controvert material facts”
• holding that the requirements for responses under Local Rule 56.1 are “not satisfied by evasive denials that do not fairly meet the substance of the material facts asserted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).