Lionel Amron, Chana Yampolsky, and David Yampolsky v. Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc. And Morgan Stanley Distributors Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, in resisting a motion to dismiss, \bald assertions and conclusions of law will not suffice\
• holding that in opposing a motion to dismiss, “bald assertions and conclusions of law will not suffice”
• concluding that, in resisting a motion to 5 Specifically, plaintiffs assert that, in order to effect the conspiracy, defendants: (a) Participated in meetings in the United States and Europe to discuss pricing and market divisions; (b
• holding that sole allegation comparing fee to \industry mean” was \inadequate” because it \conveniently omitt[ed] where [the'fund’s rate] fell on the distribution of fees” and made only a specific comparison to one other mutual fund \known for its emphasis on keeping costs low”
• noting that “bald assertions and conclusions of law will not suffice” to defeat a motion to dismiss (citation omitted)
• noting that “a plaintiffs burden to overcome this presumption is a heavy one”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).