LIONCAP, LLC v. NVR, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that similar jurisdictional bar precluded review only of administration of statute, not of challenge to statute itself
• holding that similar jurisdictional bar precluded review only of administration of statute, not of challenge to statute itself
• holding that prior version of the statute did not preclude judicial review of action challenging the constitutionality of veterans’ benefits legislation
• holding that district courts have jurisdiction to entertain constitutional attacks on the operation of the DVA claims system
• holding that provision barring review of \`decisions of the Administrator on any question of law or fact under any law administered by the Veterans' Administration providing benefits for veterans'\ did not bar constitutional challenge (emphasis deleted)
• holding that provisions of the Veterans’ Readjustment Act, while precluding judicial review of administrative decisions, did “not extend the prohibitions of that section to actions challenging the constitutionality of laws”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).