Linwood Properties, Inc. v. Fort Lee Borough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 60(b) “cannot be used as a means of avoiding dismissal for want of a timely appeal”
• \We expressly do not decide whether a Rule 60(b) motion must meet the time constraints of Rule 4(a) under other circumstances not present here.\
• “We expressly do not decide whether a Rule 60(b) motion must meet the time constraints of Rule 4(a) under other circumstances not present here.”
• \the seemingly inequitable results that may flow from a strict application of the harsh time constraints in Rule 4(a)\
• “the seemingly inequitable results that may flow from a strict application of the harsh time constraints in Rule 4(a)”
• “because the avowed purpose of the Rule 60(b) motion in this case was to extend the time for appeal, it had to meet the time limitations of Rule 4(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).