· 6/27/1927
Linvog v. Brazil
Citations
- 20 F.2d 17
- 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 2453
- 1927 A.M.C. 1686
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- examining Title IX legislative history and concluding Title IX “[is] not a panacea for all types of discrimination, but rather a limited initial attempt to end discrimination by educational institutions”
- employer’s statement to plaintiff that he could quit if he did not like the salary cuts implemented during an economic downturn insufficient evidence of age animus to sustain jury verdict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dietrich, Gilbert, Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.