Skip to main content
· 6/27/1927

Linvog v. Brazil

Citations

  • 20 F.2d 17
  • 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 2453
  • 1927 A.M.C. 1686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • examining Title IX legislative history and concluding Title IX “[is] not a panacea for all types of discrimination, but rather a limited initial attempt to end discrimination by educational institutions”
  • employer’s statement to plaintiff that he could quit if he did not like the salary cuts implemented during an economic downturn insufficient evidence of age animus to sustain jury verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dietrich, Gilbert, Rudkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.