Linville v. Moss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a verdict will be considered inadequate if the \sum [is] so low that under the facts of the case reasonable men cannot differ about its adequacy\
• discussing Type 4 classification of inadequate damage awards under Freshwater v. Booth, 160 W.Va. 156, 233 S.E.2d 312 (1977), analysis
• categorizing inadequate jury awards into four typologies and describing type four as case where liability was clearly established and jury was confused only as to measure of damages
• categorizing inadequate jury awards into four typologies and describing type four as case where liability was clearly established and jury was confused only as to measure of damages
• preserving allocation of fault and awarding new trial on damages where “the jury’s award . . . must have been based upon some misinterpretation of the law of damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).