Linton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rather than address Linton’s inability to understand the immediate flow of information, the trial court merely appointed a second standard interpreter to assist Linton during breaks.”
• “trial proceeded with a single interpreter.”
• “trial proceeded with a single interpreter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Linton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-01-14· cited 86×
• State v. Wright
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-06-24· cited 32×
• Audrey Rochelle Linton v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2009-08-28
• Linton, Audrey R.
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-01-14
• Sostenes Lorenzo Tolentino v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2024-04-23
• Sostenes Lorenzo Tolentino v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2024-12-31

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lincoln v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-04-01· cited 22×
• Salazar v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-03-12· cited 21×
• Adams v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-04-28· cited 20×
• Brazell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-29· cited 17×