Linton v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court may dismiss an action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1
• holding that the “jurisdictional issue must be resolved before the merits issue” (internal citation omitted)
• holding that a district court may dismiss an action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) when the court “lacks the statutory or Cir. 2000
• holding that at the pleading stage, the plaintiff bears the burden of “alleging facts that affirmatively and plausibly suggest that it has standing to sue” (quotation and alteration omitted)
• holding that a district court may dismiss an action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) when the court “lacks the statutory or constitutional power to adjudicate it.”
• holding that a district court must dismiss an action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) when the court “lacks the statutory or constitutional power to adjudicate it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).