Linssen v. Weintraub

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claimant’s argument that ALJ erred in failing to consider wife’s testimony noting that it is “well settled that an ALJ’s ‘adequate discussion’ of the issues need not contain a complete written evaluation of every piece of evidence”
• in discounting a treating physician’s opinion, the ALJ must “build the requisite logical bridge” between the evidence and his conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).