Michigan Supreme Court· 7/22/1897
Linnen v. Banfield
Citations
- 114 Mich. 93
- 72 N.W. 1
- 1897 Mich. LEXIS 1063
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Time is presumed to be of some importance to one incarcerated without process, and promptness is required when the information upon which proceedings are to be based is at hand, in order that the accused may not be deprived of the right to give bail.”
- “Time is presumed to be of some importance to one incarcerated without process, and promptness is required when the information upon which proceedings are to be based is at hand, in order that the accused may not be deprived of the right to give bail.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grant, Hooker, Long, Montgomery, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court· 1971-11-09· cited 128×
- People v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court· 1960-04-11· cited 105×
- State v. BrockOregon Supreme Court· 1982-11-16· cited 49×
- Oxford v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court· 1918-12-27· cited 21×
- People v. WatsonCriminal Court of the City of New York· 1963-04-15· cited 4×
- Bryan v. ComstockSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1920-04-12· cited 4×
- Plummer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1927-04-08
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.