Linn v. Linn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]oor management of one’s income is not the equivalent of a substantial change in circumstances sufficient to warrant a downward modification of an alimony award.”
• \[P]oor management of one's income is not the equivalent of a substantial change in circumstances sufficient to warrant a downward modification of an alimony award.\
• self-induced income tax problems cannot justify reduction in child support obligations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mascola v. Lusskin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-17· cited 15×
• Robinson v. Robinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-04· cited 14×
• Haas v. Haas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-08· cited 12×
• Davis v. Lopez-Davis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-09· cited 9×
• Linstroth v. Dorgan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-11· cited 8×
• Zdravkovic v. Zdravkovic
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-20· cited 5×
• Barrow v. Barrow
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-22· cited 4×
• Cason v. Cason
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-14· cited 4×
• Stacy Jaeger v. Robert M. Jaeger, D.O.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-16· cited 4×
• Whitney v. Whitney
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-20· cited 1×
• City of Miami v. Jean-Phillipe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-13
• Conness v. Conness
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-04

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ciccarelli v. Ciccarelli
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-11-15· cited 10×
• Caribbean Ship Chandler, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-08· cited 1×