Skip to main content
· 5/20/1996

Linkway Investment Co. v. Olsen (In Re Casamont Investors, Ltd.)

Citations

  • 196 B.R. 517
  • 35 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1544
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4398
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 11153
  • 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 622
  • 1996 WL 309376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Carraher but finding that the Carraher factors did not support retention of jurisdiction
  • “Discretion is given 19 the bankruptcy court to retain jurisdiction when judicial 20 economy, fairness, convenience and comity favor retention”
  • adversary proceeding 20 pending two months at time of dismissal did not favor retention; 21 retention of jurisdiction is improper when the initiation of the 22 dispute is recent
  • adversary proceeding 20 pending two months at time of dismissal did not favor retention; 21 retention of jurisdiction is improper when the initiation of the 22 dispute is recent
  • “Jurisdiction is determined as of the commencement of the action.”
  • \Jurisdiction is determined as of the commencement of 23 the action.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Russell, Barr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.