Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Link v. Crews

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 192
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 131
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3183
  • 571 U.S. 874
  • 2013 WL 3153784
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7084

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no deference where the Secretary had consistently excluded certain work from coverage under the regulation, and the Secretary’s new reading was not discernible from regulatory text

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.