Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 9/26/1963

Link Aviation, Inc. v. Downs

Citations

  • 325 F.2d 613
  • 7 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 264
  • 117 U.S. App. D.C. 40
  • 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting reading of Rule 17(a) that is “highly technical without meaningful purpose”
  • adopting Tenth Circuit’s approach to substitution under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
  • rejecting argument that suit improperly brought in name of insured, rather than real party in interest — the insurance company — was a legal nullity and allowing substitution as well as relation back to avoid running of statute of limitations
  • “Any other rule would be highly technical without meaningful purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.