Skip to main content
· 10/16/2023

Ling Chai Maginn v. Robert Maginn, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the courts of appeal lack jurisdiction to review an untimely petition for review
  • holding that judicial review provisions \are mandatory and jurisdictional . . . and are not subject to equitable tolling\ (internal citations and quotations omitted)
  • holding that judicial review provisions “are mandatory and jurisdictional ... and are not subject to equitable tolling” (internal citations and quotations omitted)
  • holding that finality of removal order “is not affected by the subsequent filing of a motion to reconsider”
  • holding that filing motion for reconsideration does not toll the period for filing a petition for judicial review of underlying order of deportation
  • holding that a court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to review a BIA decision if the petition for review is filed after the statutory deadline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Will V.C.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.