Liner Technology, Inc. v. Hayes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here an express provision in a written contract contradicts the claimed oral representation, the conflict negates the claim of reliance upon the latter[.]”
• “contingency fee agreements] ... must be in writing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Comi v. Breslin & Breslin
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-01-07· cited 18×
• Kevin Spence & Sons, Inc. v. Boar's Head Provisions Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-03-01· cited 13×
• Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Coe
  S.D. West Virginia· 2004-04-09· cited 10×
• Naiman v. New York University Hospitals Center
  S.D. New York· 2005-01-07· cited 8×
• Knight v. Barteau
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-08-25· cited 6×
• Third Avenue Trust v. SunTrust Bank
  S.D. New York· 2001-04-13· cited 2×
• Scott v. Harris Interactive, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2012-03-19· cited 2×
• Fowler v. Parks
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-03-12· cited 1×
• In re Keele
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-05-06· cited 1×
• Fried v. Bolanos
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-04-30

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Demov, Morris, Levin & Shein v. Glantz
  New York Court of Appeals· 1981-10-22· cited 70×
• John William Costello Associates, Inc. v. Standard Metals Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-02-21· cited 52×
• Bango v. Naughton
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-06-18· cited 35×