Linen v. RUSCON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that although expert testimony found claimant suffered from a 20-30% impairment to his back, testimony of vocational expert and claimant provided substantial evidence to affirm Appellate Panel’s decision finding claimant’s impairment exceeded 50%
• affirming a finding of greater than fifty percent loss of use of the back when highest rating to back was twenty to thirty percent
• affirming finding of fifty percent loss of use of the back based on other evidence in the record despite doctors assigning impairment ratings of 15% and 20%-30%
• although expert testimony suggested the claimant suffered from a 20-30% impairment to his back, testimony of claimant and vocational expert was substantial evidence the claimant’s impairment exceeded 50%

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).