Lindsey v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that pro se plaintiff’s ignorance of the law does 1 The District Judge referred this case to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B
• finding abuse of discretion despite plaintiff’s failure to “provide the addresses of all the parties that had to be served”
• finding IFP plaintiff showed good cause for failure to serve because he moved to appoint a special server and tried to effect service himself and through the clerk of court
• stating standard of review for “dismissal for failure to effect timely service of process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).