Skip to main content

Lindsey v. Trinity Communications, Inc.

Citations

  • 275 S.W.3d 411
  • 2009 Tenn. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the work performed by the subcontractor’s employees was not a regular part of the company’s business, but concluding that the company was a principal contractor because the work performed was the same type usually performed by the company’s employees
  • explaining that “[wjhether work is a regular part of the business of any entity is a fact-specific inquiry ... relative to the size and scope of the business”
  • “Whether work is a regular part of the business of any entity is a fact-specific inquiry, relative to the size and scope of the business.”
  • worker injured while splicing cable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Drowota, Holder, III, Koch, Wade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.