Lindsey v. Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “an insurer has a duty to investigate and adjust claims in good faith”
• stating that “an insurer has a duty to investigate and adjust claims in good faith”
• stating that “an insurer has a duty to investigate and adjust claims in good faith”
• noting that in case in which insurer did not dispute coverage, but disputed only the amount to be paid, the case involved an alleged unreasonable delay, not an unreasonable denial
• distinguishing the policyholder's duty of good faith from their duty to cooperate under the terms of the contract
• finding no express or implied consent to amend under Colorado law, where “nothing in the record” showed that the plaintiff “understood [certain] evidence was being introduced on the unpleaded defenses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).