District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/16/1992
Lindsay v. State
Citations
- 606 So. 2d 652
- 1992 WL 222132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that condition of probation requiring defendant to place advertisement in newspaper consisting of his picture and statement that he had been convicted of D.U.I. served both rehabilitative and punitive purpose and was valid
- condition of probation requiring defendant to place a newspaper advertisement showing a mug shot, name and caption \DUI-convicted\ upheld under Florida statute
- condition of probation requiring defendant to place a newspaper advertisement showing a mug shot, name and caption \DUI-convicted\ upheld under Florida statute
- over 46% of traffic fatalities in Florida in 1990 were related to intoxication
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BurdinTennessee Supreme Court· 1996-05-28· cited 90×
- State v. MuhammadMontana Supreme Court· 2002-03-18· cited 71×
- People v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-04-17· cited 49×
- United States v. Shawn GementeraNinth Circuit· 2004-08-09· cited 40×
- State v. WarnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-18· cited 23×
- Saidi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-30· cited 15×
- People v. HarrisColorado Court of Appeals· 1997-01-09· cited 4×
- State v. BuchanonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-28· cited 1×
- Opinion No.Texas Attorney General Reports· 1997-04-11
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-31· cited 98×
- Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-03· cited 90×
- Hines v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-04-20· cited 89×
- United States v. William Anderson Company, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1983-02-04· cited 23×
- Wiggins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-23· cited 15×
- Goldschmitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-09· cited 12×
- United States v. CarlstonN.D. California· 1983-03-23· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.