Skip to main content
· 12/12/1940

Lindsay v. Rickenbacker

Citations

  • 116 F.2d 29
  • 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Sanders and holding that a post-conviction petition challenging a police search under the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments was successive when the petitioner had previously challenged the constitutionality of the search on direct appeal
  • applying Sanders and holding that a post-conviction petition challenging a police search under the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments was successive when the petitioner had previously challenged the constitutionality of the search on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foster, Hutcheson, Sibley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.