Lindsay v. Board of Appeals of Milton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding undersized lot held in common ownership with adjoining lot did not retain a separate identity because deed conveyed the two lots as one lot and the property had been jointly assessed as one lot
• holding undersized lot held in common ownership with adjoining lot did not retain a separate identity because deed conveyed the two lots as one lot and the property had been jointly assessed as one lot
• “The mere fact that the [deeds] refer to [multiple lots] is insufficient to give rise to a presumption of intention to preserve the lots designated therein”
• “The mere fact that the [deeds] refer to [multiple lots] is insufficient to give rise to a presumption of intention to preserve the lots designated therein”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).