Lindquist v. Johnson

Citations

• 12 S.D. 486
• 81 N.W. 900
• 1900 S.D. LEXIS 62

Syllabus

<p>Where an attachment affidavit charged that defendants had disposed of a part of their property with intent to defraud creditors, and were about to dispose of the balance thereof with such intent, and that the debt was incurred for property obtained by false pretenses, it was error for the court to vacate a writ issued thereon on defendants’ motion, he having failed to deny that the debt was incurred for property obtained under false pretense», since by Comp. Laws, 4995, subd. 3, such allegation was alone sufficient to entitle plaintiff to an attachment.</p>