Lindhag v. State, Department of Natural Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that board properly relied on expert with more training in environmental medicine
• rejecting the argument that a worker's asthma was caused by workplace exposure to chemicals when the worker was diagnosed with asthma after the exposure
• “Review of an agency’s application of its own regulation to the facts is limited to whether the agency’s decision was arbitrary, unreasonable, or an abuse of discretion.”
• board may appropriately rely on one medical expert over others where decision to do so is accompanied by sufficient explanation and medical expert's opinion constitutes substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).