Linden v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that non-tenured teachers had no property right in their employment, and that § 121.22(G)(1) did not give them‘a right to a hearing on the issue of their continued employment
• explaining that the law guarantees the right to a public hearing only if that right is “elsewhere provided by law”
• explaining that the law guarantees the right to a public hearing only if that right is “elsewhere provided by law”
• “Under [R.C. 121.22(G)(1)], a public body may meet in executive session to consider the employment of a public employee, unless the public employee ‘requests a public hearing.’ In that event, an open session must be held.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).