Lindemann v. Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the Commission did not fail or refuse to act and Lindemann is not ‘aggrieved’ by the Commission’s decision, we conclude that MAPA does not confer standing on Lindemann to appeal from the Commission’s decision.”
• Petitioner was \moved to Security Building on 7 /2\
• “While there is an express provision in MAPA allowing for the judicial review of agency decisions, MAPA limits standing to petition for judicial review to those who are ‘aggrieved.’ As we have explained, Lindemann is not aggrieved, and thus has no right of judicial review under MAPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).