Linda Sosna, Individually, as Ad Litem and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard S. Sosna v. H. Bradley Binnington, M.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that internist was “competent,” id. at 746, to testify about standard of care of surgeon, based on expertise and experience treating patients who underwent surgeries
• concluding that internist was “competent,” id. at 746, to testify about standard of care of surgeon, based on expertise and experience treating patients who underwent surgeries
• finding no abuse of discretion in district court’s decision to limit the scope of expert cross-examination based on relevance and risk of confusing the jury or unfairly prejudicing party
• “The Federal -3- Rules of Evidence govern the admissibility of evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).