Linda Place, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Abbott Laboratories, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an employee’s trans- fer to another position with the same title, pay, and benefits was not an adverse action
• concluding that an employer’s decision to split up two workers whose soured romance affected the company’s progress was not retaliatory
• concluding that an employer’s decision to split up two workers whose soured romance affected the company’s progress was not retaliatory
• holding that “being shifted to an essentially equivalent job that [an employee] did not happen to like as much does not a Title VII claim create”
• holding that the continuing violation doctrine does not apply where plaintiff knows at the time of the act that it was discriminatory and that it harmed her
• finding that “an employer’s decision to split up two workers whose interpersonal problems [were] impeding the company’s pro- gress [was] not retaliation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).