Linda P. Barrett v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]ecause Barrett's lawyer did not question the basis for the vocational expert's testimony, purely conclusional though that testimony was, any objection to it is forfeited.”
• “[B]ecause Barrett's lawyer did not question the basis for the [VE’s] testimony, . . . any objection to it is forfeited.”
• “[B]ecause Barrett’s lawyer did not question the basis for the [VE’s] testimony, ... any objection to it is forfeited.”
• “[B]ecause Barrett’s lawyer did not question the basis for the [VE’s] testimony, . . . any objection to it is forfeited.”
• “Even if Barrett’s arthritis was not particularly serious in itself, it would interact with her obesity to make standing for two hours at a time more painful than it would be for a person who was either as obese as she or as arthritic as she but not both.”
• “Even if Barrett’s arthritis [in her knees] was not particularly serious in itself, it would interact with her obesity to make standing for two hours at a time more painful than it would be for a person who was either as obese as she or as arthritic as she but not both.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).