· 1/21/1986
Linda Gosa, Cross-Appellant v. Bryce Hospital, Cross-Appellee
Citations
- 780 F.2d 917
- 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 807
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21818
- 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,910
- 43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1812
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the requirements for proving an exception are not met unless the factor of sex provides no part of the basis for the wage differential
- the requirements for proving an exception are not met unless the factor of sex provides no part of the basis for the wage differential
- the requirements for proving an exception are not met unless the factor of sex provides no part of the basis for the wage differential
- “A male to whom a female plaintiff is compared for purposes of determining whether a wage discrepancy exists for Equal Pay Act purposes is referred to as a ‘comparator.’”
- “A male to whom a female plaintiff is compared for purposes of determining whether a wage discrepancy exists for Equal Pay Act purposes is referred to as a ‘comparator.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roney, Anderson, Morgan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.