Skip to main content
· 1/21/1986

Linda Gosa, Cross-Appellant v. Bryce Hospital, Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 780 F.2d 917
  • 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 807
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21818
  • 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,910
  • 43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the requirements for proving an exception are not met unless the factor of sex provides no part of the basis for the wage differential
  • the requirements for proving an exception are not met unless the factor of sex provides no part of the basis for the wage differential
  • the requirements for proving an exception are not met unless the factor of sex provides no part of the basis for the wage differential
  • “A male to whom a female plaintiff is compared for purposes of determining whether a wage discrepancy exists for Equal Pay Act purposes is referred to as a ‘comparator.’”
  • “A male to whom a female plaintiff is compared for purposes of determining whether a wage discrepancy exists for Equal Pay Act purposes is referred to as a ‘comparator.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roney, Anderson, Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.