Linda Gilbert v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the ALJ's conclusory finding that some of the claimant's alleged impairments were not severe supported his decision to disregard the VE's opinion to the extent it relied on those impairments
• noting that the ALJ’s conclusory finding that some of the claimant’s alleged impairments were not severe supported his decision to disregard the VE’s opinion to the extent it relied on those impairments
• recognizing “contradictory evidence in the administrative record” did not support the ALJ’s decision to stop the sequential analysis at step two
• recognizing “contradictory evidence in the administrative record” did not support the ALJ’s decision to stop the sequential analysis at step two
• noting that the ALJ's conclusory finding that some of the claimant's alleged impairments were not severe supported his decision to disregard the VE's opinion to the extent it relied on those impairments
• finding “contradictory evidence” in the record did not support the ALJ’s decision to stop at step two

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).