LINDA DORRIS, Employee-Respondent v. STODDARD COUNTY, Employer-Appellant.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the hazard was not the hazard of slipping on ice in general, but the hazard of slipping on that ice in..that particular ■parking lot”
• “[t]here is, no evidence in the record that Claimant, had any exposure to this particular hazard during her nonemployment life and therefore, the record could not support a conclusion by the Commission that she was equally exposed to that hazard in her nonemployment life”
• “There is no evidence in the record that claimant had any exposure to this particular hazard [(a crack in street)] during her nonemployment life and therefore, the record could not support a conclusion by the Commission that she was equally exposed to that hazard in her nonemployment life.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).