Lincoln House, Inc. v. Paul W. Dupre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting in dictum that six acts of mail fraud over 26 months were too sporadic to satisfy continuity requirement
• affirming district court’s dismissal of claim as not ripe where injury was contingent upon outcome of pending state court litigation
• refusing on Article III ripeness grounds to address claim based on abstract injury \that may not occur as anticipated or may not occur at all\
• “[I]t is not clear whether injunctive or other equitable relief is available at all in private civil RICO actions.”
• “[I]t is not clear whether injunctive or other equitable relief is available at all in private civil RICO actions”
• six acts of mail fraud over a twenty-six month period suggests “ ‘only sporadic criminal activity’ that would neither amount to nor pose a threat of continued criminal activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).