· 5/14/2009
Lincoln General Insurance Co. v. Bailey
Citations
- 224 P.3d 336
- 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 811
- 2009 WL 1331094
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a court may find a contract “unconscionable” when enforcement of its terms would result in a “profound sense of injustice”
- “[I]f insurance policies are clear and unambiguous, they require no construction or interpretation and are to be enforced as written.”
- doctrine of reasonable expectations is an interpretative tool used to resolve an ambiguity, and where an exclusion in a policy is unambiguous, the doctrine does not apply
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roy, Casebolt, Connelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.