Skip to main content
· 5/14/2009

Lincoln General Insurance Co. v. Bailey

Citations

  • 224 P.3d 336
  • 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 811
  • 2009 WL 1331094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a court may find a contract “unconscionable” when enforcement of its terms would result in a “profound sense of injustice”
  • “[I]f insurance policies are clear and unambiguous, they require no construction or interpretation and are to be enforced as written.”
  • doctrine of reasonable expectations is an interpretative tool used to resolve an ambiguity, and where an exclusion in a policy is unambiguous, the doctrine does not apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roy, Casebolt, Connelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.