Lincoln Electric System v. Nebraska Public Service Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “home rule” city has the legal authority to provide telecommunication services incidental to other public purposes
• Nebraska Supreme Court noting that while state courts are bound by the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of federal law, they are not bound by circuit courts' interpretations
• Nebraska Supreme Court noting that while state courts are bound by the United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of federal law, they are not bound by circuit courts’ interpretations
• Nebraska Supreme Court noting that while state courts are bound by the United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of federal law, they are not bound by circuit courts’ interpretations
• Nebraska Supreme Court noting that while state courts are bound by the United States 9 Only three other Courts of Appeals apply this factor or a variation thereof: the Third Circuit, Fuentes v. Perskie, 32 F.3d 759, 764 (3d Cir. 1994
• question of preemption of state law by federal Telecommunications Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).