· 12/19/1952
Linch v. Carlson
Citations
- 56 N.W.2d 101
- 156 Neb. 308
- 1952 Neb. LEXIS 33
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding projected pro forma goals were not actionable in fraud because they were “a prediction about the future, not a statement about the past or even the present”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carter, Messmore, Yeager, Chappell, Wenke, Boslaugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.