Linares v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no issue of juror confusion when two co-defendants were tried together and presented antagonistic defenses
• finding no issue of juror confusion when two co-defendants were tried together and presented antagonistic defenses
• statements made after invocation of right to counsel and in response to police-initiated questioning were involuntary
• Supreme Court has applied harmless error analysis to the admission of involuntary confessions
• “[s]ince the record fails to establish that [the defendant] would have testified in his own defense if the trial court had ruled his statement was inadmissible, any review of his constitutional claim would be speculative”
• “The issue [of voluntariness] presents a mixed question of fact and law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).