Skip to main content
· 4/17/2012

Lin v. U.S. Attorney General

Citations

  • 677 F.3d 1043
  • 82 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 404
  • 2012 WL 1288811
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statutory time limit for filing a petition for review in an immigration proceeding is mandatory and jurisdictional and not subject to equitable tolling
  • stating that the time limit for filing a petition for review is 3 Case: 19-12304 Date Filed: 03/18/2020 Page: 4 of 5 mandatory and jurisdictional
  • noting that the statutory time limit is mandatory, jurisdictional, and not subject to equitable tolling
  • noting that the statutory time limit for filing a petition for review in an immigration proceeding is mandatory, jurisdictional, and not subject to equitable tolling
  • noting that the statutory time limit is mandatory, juris- dictional, and not subject to equitable tolling
  • stating that Court of Appeals would lack jurisdiction over petition to review immigration proceeding, which was subject to a mandatory jurisdictional filing period, \unless the Clerk's office was 'inaccessible' on the day the * * * petition was due\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Pryor, Fay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.