· 8/5/2004
Limpert v. Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp.
Citations
- 328 F. Supp. 2d 360
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15080
- 2004 WL 1746339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying a motion to dismiss CROA claims where “drawing reasonable inferences in Plaintiffs’ favor..., it may be proven that certain of Defendants represented that they would re-establish their clients’ spotty credit reports”
- legitimate forms of credit counseling not actionable under the CROA
- dismissing CROA claims against organizations with 501(c)(3) status
- applying the CROA to a law firm
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Platt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.