Skip to main content
· 8/5/2004

Limpert v. Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp.

Citations

  • 328 F. Supp. 2d 360
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15080
  • 2004 WL 1746339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying a motion to dismiss CROA claims where “drawing reasonable inferences in Plaintiffs’ favor..., it may be proven that certain of Defendants represented that they would re-establish their clients’ spotty credit reports”
  • legitimate forms of credit counseling not actionable under the CROA
  • dismissing CROA claims against organizations with 501(c)(3) status
  • applying the CROA to a law firm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.