Skip to main content
· 11/13/2015

Limbaugh, Stephen Glen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failure to make monthly payments as agreed to in contract was material breach because payments were “essential and inducing feature”
  • \We clarify today that the complete and strict performance requirements in construction contracts apply only to the design and construction work itself\
  • essential and inducing features of contract are provisions so serious that \a failure to uphold the provision would justify the other party walking away from the contract\
  • “The nonbreaching party is entitled to be made whole and no more.”
  • failure to pay subcontractors on time was material breach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.