· 7/19/2011
Lima v. Newark Police Department
Citations
- 658 F.3d 324
- 80 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 200
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14741
- 2011 WL 2811277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that separately captioned prayer for relief “was not part of a particular claim or count in the complaint”
- holding that the phrase “all of Plaintiffs claims for relief’ was ambiguous
- holding courts may not consider extrinsic evidence when interpreting an offer of judgment
- remanding to district court for an award of attorneys’ fees where offer of judgment for all “claims for relief” was silent and ambiguous as to attorney fees
- the Third Circuit found the defendant's offer ambiguous, interpreted it against the offeror, and held that the offer did not include costs.
- “The doctrine of invited error refers to an error that a party cannot complain of ... because the party, through conduct, encouraged or prompted the trial court to make the erroneous ruling.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter, Hardiman, Aldisert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.