Skip to main content
· 7/19/2011

Lima v. Newark Police Department

Citations

  • 658 F.3d 324
  • 80 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 200
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14741
  • 2011 WL 2811277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that separately captioned prayer for relief “was not part of a particular claim or count in the complaint”
  • holding that the phrase “all of Plaintiffs claims for relief’ was ambiguous
  • holding courts may not consider extrinsic evidence when interpreting an offer of judgment
  • remanding to district court for an award of attorneys’ fees where offer of judgment for all “claims for relief” was silent and ambiguous as to attorney fees
  • the Third Circuit found the defendant's offer ambiguous, interpreted it against the offeror, and held that the offer did not include costs.
  • “The doctrine of invited error refers to an error that a party cannot complain of ... because the party, through conduct, encouraged or prompted the trial court to make the erroneous ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Hardiman, Aldisert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.